Critical analysis of Kramer's Popular Constitutionalism Proposal and Defense of Judicial Supremacy
Critical analysis of Kramer's Popular Constitutionalism Proposal and Defense of Judicial Supremacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48143/rdai.18.lbrfKeywords:
Federal Constitution, Popular constitutionalism, Judicial supremacy, AccountabilityAbstract
Popular constitutionalism arises as a counterpoint to liberal constitutionalism, by rejecting the supremacy of the Judicial Power and proposing the transfer of the final, binding, interpretative authority of the Supreme Court to the people. The theory, which had its most prominent manifestation in Larry Kramer's work, is based on a popular dissatisfaction with the current constitutional model and on the perspective that the people are the best interpreter to preserve the real meaning of the constitutional text. However, according to the perspective adopted in this paper, the proposal starts from mistaken assumptions, affecting, in particular, their subsistence and practical implementation. In this article, using the hypothetico-deductive method, the theory of popular constitutionalism is analyzed, followed by the criticisms developed under the conceptual aspect and the fundamental bases of the proposal of Larry Kramer. The analysis reveals that Kramer, seeking to prevent judicial tyranny, defends the proposal of popular constitutionalism, while the criticisms are directed in the sense that the fragility of the judicial supremacy gives room for a popular tyranny. However, solutions to this dilemma are decided in politics, not law. Keywords: Federal Constitution; Popular constitutionalism; Judicial supremacy; Accountability.
Author Biographies
Lara Bonemer Rocha Floriani, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil)
Doutora em Direito Econômico e Mestra em Direito Econômico e Socioambiental pela PUCPR. Graduada em Direito pela Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM). Professora no curso de Graduação em Direito da Faculdade Estácio e do Centro Universitário Unibrasil . Coordenadora da Pós-Graduação em Direito Econômico da PUCPR. lara@rochaefloriani.com.br |
0000-0002-8112-0949
Claudia Maria Barbosa, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil)
Professora titular de direito constitucional do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito na Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil). Pesquisadora bolsista produtividade do CNPq. Doutora com Pós-Doutorado no Centro de Estudos Social da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal e na York University em Toronto, Canadá. E-mail: claudia.mr.barbosa@gmail.com | 0000-0002-7055-9403
References
ALEXANDER, Larry; SOLUM, Lawrence B. Popular? Constitutionalism? Harvard Law Review. Mar. 2005. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=692224. Acesso em 15 jul. 2020.
AMAR, Akhil; HIRSCH, Alan. For the People: What the Constitution Really Says About Your Rights. New York: Simon &Schuster, 1998.
BRANDÃO, Rodrigo. Supremacia Judicial versus Diálogos Constitucionais. A quem cabe a última palavra sobre o sentido da Constituição? Rio de Janeiro: Lumem Iuris, 2017.
CHEMERINSKY, Erwin. In Defense of Judicial Supremacy, 58. Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1459 (2020), Disponível em: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs/2796. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2020.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Levando os direitos a sério. São Pauto: Martins Fontes, 2002
ELY, John Hart. Democracy and distrust. Fourteenth printing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.
GODOY, Miguel Gualano de. Devolver a constituição ao povo: crítica à supremacia judicial e diálogos interinstitucionais. Tese, UFPR, Curitiba, 2015,
JARAMILLO, Leonardo García. Introducción. In: Constitucionalismo democrático: por una reconciliación entre constitución y Pueblo. Trad. Leonardo García Jaramillo. Siglo Veintiuno Editores S.A., Buenos Aires, 2013. p. 11-29.
KRAMER, Larry D. The people themselves: popular constitutionalism and
Judicial review. New York: Oxford University Press. 2004. Pp. xii, 363.
LIMA, Gabriela Carneiro de Albuquerque Basto. A tensão entre o Povo e as Cortes: a escolha do constitucionalismo popular. Dissertação, USP, São Paulo, 2014,
MARSHALL, John. Decisões constitucionais. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1908, p. 24/27.
PARKER, Richard. Here, The People Rule: A Constitutional Populist Manifesto. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.
POST, Robert e SIEGEL, Reva. Constitucionalismo democrático. In: Constitucionalismo democrático: por una reconciliación entre constitución y Pueblo. Trad. Leonardo García Jaramillo. Siglo Veintiuno Editores S.A., Buenos Aires, 2013.
TUSHNET, MARK V. Popular Constitutionalism as Political Law. Georgetown Law. Constitutional Commons, 2006. Disponível em: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/233. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Public Law and Infrastructure - RDAI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed by (CC BY-NC-ND)
Submission and publication of articles are free; peer-reviewed; the journal uses CrossCheck (anti-plagiarism); and complies with the COPE Editors' Guide; Committee on Publication Ethics, in addition to the Elsevier and SciELO recommendations.
Check the Rules for the submission and evaluation of the RDAI.
