The Federal Court of Accounts and his non-competence to determine retention of payments in administrative contracts
The Federal Court of Accounts and his non-competence to determine retention of payments in administrative contracts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48143/RDAI.14.ggnAbstract
The adoption, by the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU – Brazil), of a provisional measure of retention payments due to contracted in administrative contracts is not covered by the Brazilian constitutional order. Retaining payments, even if partially, is nothing more than to halt the financial execution of the contract. And the original competence to suspend administrative contracts is the Brazilian National Congress (FC, art. 71, § 1º). Obliging the contracted party to perform the same physical object for a pecuniary compensation inferior to the one proposed in the bidding process disrespects still the art. 37, XXI, of the Federal Constitution, which ensures the maintenance of the effective conditions of the proposal presented. Moreover, even the Brazilian National Congress would not have the constitutional power to partially suspend the financial execution of the administrative contract (as in the case of retentions). It is only up to him to stop the administrative contract in its entirety, in the physical and financial dimensions together.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is licensed by (CC BY-NC-ND)
Submission and publication of articles are free; peer-reviewed; the journal uses CrossCheck (anti-plagiarism); and complies with the COPE Editors' Guide; Committee on Publication Ethics, in addition to the Elsevier and SciELO recommendations.
Check the Rules for the submission and evaluation of the RDAI.