System S: law, legal entity under private law and constitutional services not exclusive to the state
System S: law, legal entity under private law and constitutional services not exclusive to the state
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48143/rdai.18.enaKeywords:
Autonomous Social Services, State, Public administration, Administrative reform, LawAbstract
This paper aims to discriminate the elements of the S System, from its form of creation, through the publication of a law or equivalent normative act, through its object, its hybrid legal regime and the discrimination of non-exclusive constitutional services of the state . Certainly, an outline was made about the constituent elements of autonomous social services, starting with their legal genesis, the way in which the entities analyzed were created, as well as the legal instruments that can be used for this purpose and their legal organization. The methodology consisted of the analysis of doctrine and jurisprudence, using bibliographic and documentary methods, with emphasis on the sources of the General Theory of Law. It was concluded that the legal conformation of autonomous social services is conferred by the State based on the law that creates the entity. With regard to the legal regime, it was demonstrated that, in the relationship between them and private individuals, the rule is the application of the legal regime of private law and the internal rules of the entity itself. In another round, as these entities provide services of relevant social interest through the transfer of taxes or public funds through a management contract, they are subject to the strict regime of public law in the final control relationship that the State exercises and in budget rules. It was also shown that they perform social services, listed in art. 6 of the Federal Constitution, which are not exclusive to the State.
References
ABBOUD, Georges; CARNIO, Henrique Garbellini; OLIVEIRA, Rafael Tomaz de. Introdução ao direito: teoria, filosofia e sociologia do Direito. 4.º ed. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brasil, 2019.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Curso de direito constitucional contemporâneo: os conceitos fundamentais e a construção do novo modelo. 8ª ed. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação, 2019.
BORGES, Alice Gonzalez. Serviços Sociais Autônomos: natureza jurídica. Revista Eletrônica de Direito do Estado (REDE), Salvador, Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Público, nº 26, abril/maio/junho de 2011. Disponível em: http://www.direitodoestado.com/revista/REDE-26-ABRIL-2011-ALICE-GONZALEZ-BORGES.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de nov. de 2019.
CAVALCANTI, Themistocles Brandão. Autarquias: natureza jurídica do Serviço Social do Comércio. Revista de Direito Administrativo. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, v. 19, jan. 1950.
CUÉLLAR, Leila. Os novos serviços sociais autônomos: exame de um caso. Revista Eletrônica sobre a Reforma do Estado (RERE), Salvador, Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Público, nº 14, junho/julho/agosto, 2008. Disponível na Internet em: http://www.direitodoestado.com.br/rere.asp. Acesso em 10 de nov. de 2019.
GROSS, Aeyal M. Human rights and American public law scholarship: a comment on Robert Post. Theoretical inquiries in Law 2.1. (2001). Disponível em: https://www7.tau.ac.il/ojs/index.php/til/article/view/207/183. Acesso em 28/12/2019.
FURTADO, Lucas Rocha. Curso de direito administrativo. 5ª Edição. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2016.
HÄBERLE, Peter. Direitos fundamentais no Estado Prestacional. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2019.
JELLINEK, Georg. Teoria general del Estado. trad. Espan. 1ª ed. México: FCE, 2000.
NUNES JUNIOR, Vidal Serrano. A cidadania social na constituição de 1988: Estratégias de positivação e exigibilidade judicial dos direitos sociais. São Paulo: Verbatim, 2009.
MEIRELLES, Hely Lopes. Direito Administrativo Brasileiro. 35º' edição, São Paulo: Malheiros, 2009.
MENDES, Gilmar Ferreira. Os direitos fundamentais e seus múltiplos significados na ordem constitucional. Revista Diálogo Jurídico, Salvador: CAJ – Centro de Atualização Jurídica, nº 10, janeiro 2002. Disponível em: https://livros-e-revistas.vlex.com.br/vid/fundamentais-multiplos-significados-59306903?_ga=2.155787583.520207255.1578327971-1389459247.1578327971. Acesso em 6.1.2020.
MONACILIUNI, Mara. Diritto pubblico. 3ª ed. Napoli: Edizes, 2013.
SHAMIR, Hila. The Public/Private Distinction Now: The Challenges of Privatization and of the Regulatory State. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Volume 15, Number 1, January 2014, p. 1-25. Disponível em: https://www7.tau.ac.il/ojs/index.php/til/article/view/527/491. Acesso em 28/12/2019.
XINGZHONG YU. State Legalism and the Public/Private Divide in Chinese Legal Development. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Volume 15, Number 1, January 2014, p. 27-51. Disponível em: https://www7.tau.ac.il/ojs/index.php/til/article/view/527/491. Acesso em 28/12/2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed by (CC BY-NC-ND)
Submission and publication of articles are free; peer-reviewed; the journal uses CrossCheck (anti-plagiarism); and complies with the COPE Editors' Guide; Committee on Publication Ethics, in addition to the Elsevier and SciELO recommendations.
Check the Rules for the submission and evaluation of the RDAI.