MS 35.038 Agr-ED/DF: Suspension of contracts and application of precautionary measures by the Courts of Auditors

MS 35.038 Agr-ED/DF: Suspension of contracts and application of precautionary measures by the Courts of Auditors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48143/rdai/15.jvtg

Abstract

This current research aims the development of an analysis of the judgment of The Warrant no. 35.038/DF, when the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court analyzed the possibility of imposing precautionary measures by the Courts of Auditors to ensure the effectiveness of the sustitution decisions applied by the National Congress, according to constitutional norm. Although the transit in judgment has taken place after rejection of declaration embargoes, it is opted for the analysis of the merits of the case, for the importance of its content, to, in the end, conclude by the partial adjustment of the Supreme Court.

Author Biography

João Victor Tavares Galil, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil)

Mestre em Direito Administrativo pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Membro do corpo dirigente do Instituto de Direito Administrativo Sancionador Brasileiro – IDASAN. Advogado. E-mail: jvtgdireito@gmail.com

Revista de Direito Administrativo e Infraestrutura - RDAI

Downloads

Published

2020-11-20

How to Cite

GALIL, João Victor Tavares. MS 35.038 Agr-ED/DF: Suspension of contracts and application of precautionary measures by the Courts of Auditors: MS 35.038 Agr-ED/DF: Suspension of contracts and application of precautionary measures by the Courts of Auditors. Journal of Public Law and Infrastructure | RDAI, São Paulo: Thomson Reuters | Livraria RT, v. 4, n. 15, p. 323–332, 2020. DOI: 10.48143/rdai/15.jvtg. Disponível em: https://rdai.com.br/index.php/rdai/article/view/24. Acesso em: 21 dec. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 15 (2020)

Section

Comments of Jurisprudence | Comentários à Jurisprudência

License

This journal is licensed by (CC BY-NC-ND)  
Submission and publication of articles are free; peer-reviewed; the journal uses CrossCheck (anti-plagiarism); and complies with the COPE Editors' Guide; Committee on Publication Ethics, in addition to the Elsevier and SciELO recommendations. 
Check the Rules for the submission and evaluation of the RDAI.