The Administrative Contract in Argentina: State Exorbitance, Regulatory Modernization, and Its Counterpoint with Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48143/rdai.34.fedrianiKeywords:
Administrative Contract, State Exorbitance, Administrative Law, Public Procurement, Ley BasesAbstract
The administrative contract in Argentina stands at the intersection of state sovereignty and contractual freedom inherent to private law. Its evolution reflects structural changes in the State and its relationship with private parties, sparking debates regarding its nature and legal framework. Argentina follows a model where the Public Administration holds exorbitant prerogatives, such as the unilateral modification of contracts, to ensure the supremacy of public interest. While this feature is crucial for maintaining public services, it raises concerns about legal certainty for contractors. This study examines Argentina’s regulatory evolution, contrasting it with Brazil’s more flexible administrative contract system, which features greater decentralization and the adoption of modern public procurement mechanisms. The recently enacted "Ley Bases" introduced significant reforms impacting Argentina's public contracting framework, fueling discussions on balancing administrative efficiency with legal oversight.
Downloads
References
FARRANDO, I. (Dir.). (2003). Contratos administrativos. Buenos Aires: Lexis Nexis.
GARCÍA DE ENTERRÍA, E., & Fernández, T. R. (2024). Curso de Derecho Administrativo. Buenos Aires: La Ley.
GORDILLO, A. (s.f.). Derecho Administrativo de la Economía.
Capítulo XI: Clasificación de los contratos administrativos.
Capítulo XVI: Los contratos administrativos.
MAIRAL, H. A. (2004). De la peligrosidad o inutilidad de una teoría general del contrato administrativo. En El Contrato Administrativo en la Actualidad. Buenos Aires: La Ley.
MAIRAL, H. A. (2005). El impacto de la crisis económica en el derecho. Doctrina Pública, XXVI (2). Buenos Aires: RAP.
MARIENHOFF, M. S. (s.f.). Tratado de Derecho Administrativo. Tomo III.
PESTANA, M. (2017). A Exorbitância nos Contratos Administrativos. Revista de Direito Administrativo e Infraestrutura. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. DOI: 10.48143/rdai/01.mp DOI: https://doi.org/10.48143/rdai/01.mp
BERGAMASCHINE MATA DIZ, J., & CORREIA DA SILVA GOMES CALDAS, R. (2016). Contratos administrativos à luz de novas formas de gestão e da sustentabilidade: por uma concretização do desenvolvimento sustentável no Brasil. A&C – Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, 16(65). DOI: 10.21056/aec.v16i65.267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v16i65.267
DAL POZZO, A. N. (2011). Regime Diferenciado de Contratações Públicas – RDC. Belo Horizonte: Fórum.
DROMI, R. (2015). Direito Administrativo Brasileiro. São Paulo: Atlas.
Normativa
Constitución de la Nación Argentina. (1994).
Ley 13.064. (s.f.). Normativa sobre contratos de obras públicas.
Ley 19.549. (s.f.). Ley Nacional de Procedimientos Administrativos.
Ley 27.742. (2024). Ley Bases y Puntos de Partida para la Libertad de los Argentinos.
Decreto 1023/2001. (s.f.). Régimen de Contrataciones de la Administración Nacional.
Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. (1988).
Lei 8.666/1993. (s.f.). Lei de Licitações e Contratos Administrativos.
Lei 12.462/2011. (s.f.). Regime Diferenciado de Contratações – RDC.
Lei 14.133/2021. (s.f.). Nova Lei de Licitações e Contratos Administrativos.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Public Law and Infrastructure | RDAI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed by (CC BY-NC-ND)
Submission and publication of articles are free; peer-reviewed; the journal uses CrossCheck (anti-plagiarism); and complies with the COPE Editors' Guide; Committee on Publication Ethics, in addition to the Elsevier and SciELO recommendations.
Check the Rules for the submission and evaluation of the RDAI.


